Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:36:00PM +0200, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte wrote:
 > * Richard Knutsson ([email protected]) wrote:
 > > Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
 > hi,
 > 
 > > Would it not be preferable to use a 's32' instead of an 'int'? After 
 > > all, it seem 'val' needs to be 32 bits.
 > 
 > not sure, but wouldnt this collide with platforms where an int is 64
 > Bits?

None of the 64-bit Linux ports use ILP64.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
    • From: Eric Sesterhenn <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
    • From: Eric Sesterhenn <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
    • From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
    • From: Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] Signedness issue in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]