Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__

On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:36:49 -0500
Chase Venters <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unless 'errno' has some significant reason to live on in the kernel, I think 
> it would be better to kill it and write kernel syscall macros that don't muck 
> with it.

We have been working in that direction.  It's certainly something we'd like
to kill off.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
    • From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Return real errno from execve in ____call_usermodehelper
    • From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Return real errno from execve in ____call_usermodehelper
    • From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
    • From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]