Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check

Ar Sul, 2006-08-20 am 03:46 +0400, ysgrifennodd Solar Designer:
> Willy,
> 
> I propose the attached patch (extracted from 2.4.33-ow1) for inclusion
> into 2.4.34-pre.  (Last time I checked, 2.6 needed an equivalent fix,
> but I haven't produced one yet.)

Acked-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

but should go into 2.6-mm and be tested in 2.6-mm before 2.4 backport.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check
    • From: Solar Designer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check
    • From: Solar Designer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] getsockopt() early argument sanity checking
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]