Re: [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:01:51 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> This folds update_ntp_one_tick() into second_overflow() and adds
> time_adjust to the tick length, this makes time_next_adjust unnecessary.
> This slightly changes the adjtime() behaviour, instead of applying it to
> the next tick, it's applied to the next second.
...
> -/* Don't completely fail for HZ > 500.  */
> -int tickadj = 500/HZ ? : 1;		/* microsecs */

The tickadj is used by cris, frv, m32r, m68k, mips and sparc.  This
patch would break build on those platforms.

I have not looked at this patch closely yet.  Just a report.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [NTP 0/9] NTP patches
    • From: [email protected]
  • [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext2: avoid needless discard of preallocated blocks
• Previous by thread: [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length
• Next by thread: Re: [NTP 5/9] add time_adjust to tick length
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]