On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:37:06AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 23:16 +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:24:54AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc4/2.6.18-rc4-mm1/
> > >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > The following patch adds minor fixes to the drm code:
> > - fix return values that are wrong (return E* instead of return -E*)
>
> are you sure the callers of these don't wrap it inside a DRM_ERR()
> macro ?
I changed the values when:
- I've checked what seemed right, getting back to the system call.
drm_ioctl(), through a call to func().
That's the case for:
- the EFAULT value in i915_emit_box
- two EINVAL values in drm_setversion
- the return value wasn't used. That was the case for
drm_set_busid return values, I felt having returned values negative
from the start was more consistent.
Is there a particular change that looked suspicious to you?
Thanks,
Frederik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]