Re: [PATCH] kill extraneous printk in kernel_restart()

Cal Peake <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason for printing a single dot and newline in 
> kernel_restart()? If not, below is a one-liner to kill it.

Hmm.  This looks like a thinko from my original patch.

Signed-off-By: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

> -- 
>
> Get rid of an extraneous printk in kernel_restart().
>
> Signed-off-by: Cal Peake <[email protected]>
>
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc4/kernel/sys.c~orig	2006-08-07 22:00:27.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4/kernel/sys.c	2006-08-18 16:52:52.000000000 -0400
> @@ -611,7 +611,6 @@ void kernel_restart(char *cmd)
>  	} else {
>  		printk(KERN_EMERG "Restarting system with command '%s'.\n", cmd);
>  	}
> -	printk(".\n");
>  	machine_restart(cmd);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_restart);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] kill extraneous printk in kernel_restart()
    • From: Cal Peake <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: can I insmod a module if my hardware donot support it?
• Next by Date: Re: can I insmod a module if my hardware donot support it?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] kill extraneous printk in kernel_restart()
• Next by thread: Complaint about return code convention in queue_work() etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]