On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:25:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
>Does anyone have an example with working kernels for both 2.4 and 2.6
>and a significantely bigger functionally equivalent 2.6 kernel?
grant@peetoo:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1138921 2006-07-30 07:18 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1139045 2006-07-30 06:35 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1139058 2006-07-30 06:00 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1138830 2006-08-12 15:55 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1632535 2006-07-29 16:34 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1644014 2006-08-09 14:48 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1643932 2006-08-14 05:25 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8b
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1668673 2006-08-09 16:25 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a
grant@sempro:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1129330 2006-07-30 07:04 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1129379 2006-07-30 06:35 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1129523 2006-07-30 05:46 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1133768 2006-08-12 15:55 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1783286 2006-07-29 16:34 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1746301 2006-08-09 14:48 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1746294 2006-08-14 05:23 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8b
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1795269 2006-08-07 09:33 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc3-mm2a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1770411 2006-08-09 16:25 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a
grant@silly:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1042781 2006-07-30 07:25 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1042926 2006-07-30 06:45 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1042947 2006-07-30 06:04 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1042782 2006-08-12 15:55 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1417798 2006-07-29 16:34 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1430140 2006-08-09 14:48 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1451699 2006-08-09 16:32 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a
grant@stinkpad:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 795909 2006-07-30 07:08 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 795939 2006-07-30 06:23 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 831636 2006-07-30 05:45 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 831623 2006-08-12 16:25 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 831614 2006-07-28 12:08 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-rc3
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1155031 2006-07-29 16:33 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1140869 2006-07-29 14:10 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.7a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1141543 2006-08-09 14:48 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1767681 2006-08-02 16:17 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc3a [1]
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1770411 2006-08-09 15:59 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a [1]
grant@tosh:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1001949 2006-07-30 07:18 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1003065 2006-07-30 06:35 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1001865 2006-07-30 06:01 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1001815 2006-08-12 15:55 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1758378 2006-07-29 16:34 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1765996 2006-08-09 14:48 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1770972 2006-08-09 16:25 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a
grant@niner:~$ ls -l /boot/bzImage-2.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 849759 2006-07-30 07:21 /boot/bzImage-2.4.30-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 849671 2006-07-30 06:35 /boot/bzImage-2.4.31-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 925166 2006-07-30 06:00 /boot/bzImage-2.4.32-hf32.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 925027 2006-08-12 15:55 /boot/bzImage-2.4.33-final
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1331906 2006-07-29 16:33 /boot/bzImage-2.6.16.27a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1340701 2006-08-09 14:49 /boot/bzImage-2.6.17.8a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1361000 2006-08-09 16:25 /boot/bzImage-2.6.18-rc4a
Looks like a consistent ~40% bloat to me ;)
Configs (grep = .config) up on <http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/>, very
similar configs as I dual boot 2.4 / 2.6 for testing. NICs and vfst/ntfs
as modules on boxen dual-boot 'doze/linux.
2.6 boots but no longer works properly on box deltree since last couple
releases, I have no desire to take the firewall box down to discover why
2.6 no longer does networking like it used to. 2.6 leaving old hardware
behind, who cares? Is why I stay with 2.4 on older hardware.
[1] fails to boot, locks up just after lilo, too early in boot to gain
any clues at all :( IBM 365X early model, usually runs win98, an orphan?
Grant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
