Re: [PATCH][CHAR] Return better error codes if drivers/char/raw.c module init fails

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:27:43 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:18:30 +0200
> Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Currently this module just returns 1 if anything on module init
> > fails. Store the error code of the different function calls and
> > return their error on problems.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this doesn't need even more cleanup, for example
> > kobj_put() is called only in one error case.
> > 
> 
> You seem to be using kmail in funky-confuse-sylpheed mode.  Inlined
> patches in plain-text emails are preferred, please.  

Something about the SLIM docum. patch did that too, although
it was not an attachment.
Sylpheed had trouble with the line endings....
Saving the patch to a file works well, but replying to it looks
like garbage.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH][CHAR] Return better error codes if drivers/char/raw.c module init fails
  - From: Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][CHAR] Return better error codes if drivers/char/raw.c module init fails
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4] aoe [06/13]: clean up printks via macros
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Unify interface to persistent CMOS/RTC/whatever clock
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][CHAR] Return better error codes if drivers/char/raw.c module init fails
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][CHAR] Return better error codes if drivers/char/raw.c module init fails
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]