Re: Question about handling return value of device_create_file function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/18/06, Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,

I have noticed that sparse generates a lot of "ignoring return value
of 'device_create_file'" warnings.

(cat sparse.txt | grep -c "device_create_file"
1231 :)

I want to fix this warnings, but I'm wondering how to properly handle
return value of device_create_file function.

The shortest way.

int foo()
{
       int error;

       [..]

       error = device_create_file(&bar, &bas)

       if (error)
               return error;
}

A bit longer way.

int foo()
{
       int error;

       [..]

       error = device_create_file(&bar, &bas)

       if (error) {
               subsystem_remove_device(bar);
               return error;
       }
}


Normally you should use 2nd form, especially when foo is a
module_init(foo) as you do not want to have a half-registered device
without supporting code in kernel.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux