Re: Page cache using B-trees benchmark results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vishal Patil wrote:
Folks

I am attaching the benchmark results for Page Cache Implementation
using B-trees. I basically ran the tio (threaded i/o) benchmark
against my kernel (with the B-tree implementation) and the Linux
kernel shipped with FC5. Radix tree implementation is definately
better however the B-tree implementation did not suck that bad :)

Also I attaching a new patch which was used for measuring the
benchmarks. Also henceforth changes to the page will be tracked using
the projected hosted at http://code.google.com/p/btreepc

Thanks for this. I guess a purist would say that you need to run against the base kernel and base kernel plus your patches, but these numbers are certainly enough to support your conclusion.

What's next?

--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a
normal user and is setuid root, with the "vi" line edit mode selected,
and the character set is "big5," an off-by-one errors occurs during
wildcard (glob) expansion.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux