On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:29:01PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Was there noticeable performance difference when explicit prefetching is
removed? At some (invisible) point CPUs will become smarter about prefetching
than programmers and this code will be slower than possible.
> +static inline struct sk_buff *get_skb_by_index(struct sk_buff **skb_array,
> + int arr_len,
> + struct ehea_cqe *cqe)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + void *pref;
> + int x;
> + int skb_index = EHEA_BMASK_GET(EHEA_WR_ID_INDEX, cqe->wr_id);
> +
> + x = skb_index + 1;
> + x &= (arr_len - 1);
> +
> + pref = (void*)skb_array[x];
> + prefetchw(pref);
> + prefetchw(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE);
> +
> + pref = (void*)(skb_array[x]->data);
> + prefetch(pref);
> + prefetch(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE);
> + prefetch(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE * 2);
> + prefetch(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE * 3);
> + skb = skb_array[skb_index];
> + skb_array[skb_index] = NULL;
> + return skb;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct sk_buff *get_skb_by_index_ll(struct sk_buff **skb_array,
> + int arr_len, int wqe_index)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + void *pref;
> + int x;
> +
> + x = wqe_index + 1;
> + x &= (arr_len - 1);
> +
> + pref = (void*)skb_array[x];
> + prefetchw(pref);
> + prefetchw(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE);
> +
> + pref = (void*)(skb_array[x]->data);
> + prefetchw(pref);
> + prefetchw(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE);
> +
> + skb = skb_array[wqe_index];
> + skb_array[wqe_index] = NULL;
> + return skb;
> +}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
