On Thu 17-08-06 22:30:30, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 17:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Well, I guess v4l api will need to be improved, then. That is still
> > not a reason to introduce completely new api...
>
> The API as implemented by the driver I submitted is very minimalistic,
> because it is just a starting point. There's more to be added in future,
> like controlling flashes, interfacing to line-scan cameras clocked by
> incremental encodes attached to some conveyor, and other stuff which
> is common in industrial image processing applications. You really do
If it is _common_, we definitely need an API. We do not want the next
driver to reinvent it from scratch, right?
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
