On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 08:58 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> Sorry I didn't look at this more closely earlier.
>
> Just looking at this function alone it looks to me like it is
> essentially part of a dentry instantiation which would mean a negative
> dentry is perfectly valid at the point above.
I looked again, scratch this comment.
Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]