Ian wrote:
> I'd suggest 'computing_power' might be less ambiguous.
Eh ... I should quit suggesting names, until I figure
out more accurately what it means.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- From: Ian Stirling <[email protected]>
- [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL Violation?
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- Index(es):
 |