On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 08:14 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Take a look at blk_congestion_wait(). It doesn't know about request > queues. We'd need a new > > void writeback_congestion_end(int rw) > { > wake_up(congestion_wqh[rw]); > } > > or similar. ...and how often do you want us to call this? NFS doesn't know much about request queues either: it writes out pages on a per-RPC call basis. In the worst case that could mean waking up the VM every time we write out a single page. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- References:
- RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
- Next by Date: Re: [MODSLAB 3/7] A Kmalloc subsystem
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- Next by thread: Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.
- Index(es):