Hi,
In article <[email protected]> (at Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:56:40 -0400 (EDT)), James Morris <[email protected]> says:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > - if (inet2->num == snum &&
> > - sk2 != sk &&
> > - !ipv6_only_sock(sk2) &&
> > - (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if ||
> > - !sk->sk_bound_dev_if ||
> > - sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
>
>
> > + sk_for_each(sk2, node, head)
> > + if (inet_sk(sk2)->num == snum &&
> > + sk2 != sk &&
> > + (!sk2->sk_reuse || !sk->sk_reuse) &&
> > + (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
> > + || sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
>
>
> Doesn't this change the behavior for IPV6_V6ONLY sockets ?
It is tested in ipv4_rcv_saddr_equal() (called vi saddr_cmp), isn't it?
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
