Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 17:27 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> charged kernel objects can't be _reclaimed_. how do you propose
> to reclaim tasks page tables or files or task struct or vma or etc.?

Do you have any statistics on which of these objects are the most
troublesome?  If it _is_ pagetables, for instance, it is quite
conceivable that we could reclaim them.

This one probably deserves a big, fat comment, though. ;)

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PATCH/FIX for drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
• Next by Date: Re: PATCH/FIX for drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]