Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > The kernel people are certainly not infallible either. And there are cases
> > where the right order is A B C, and others in which it is C B A, and still
> > others where it doesn't matter.
> In the quite unlikely situation where that happens, you've obviously
> got a piece of software which is broken dependency-wise. Many of the
> current schemes will fail to accommodate that too.
It isn't broken /software/, it is /different setups/.
It's broken software.
> For example, no amount of moving the /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K35smb script
> around will fix that situation on Red Hat.
What situation?
The situation you outlined, where A can depend on B, which can depend
on C, but in another usage scenario C can depend on B which can depend
on A.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
