Re: PATCH: Multiprobe sanitizer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 05:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Probe ordering is fragile and completely defeated with busses that are
> > already probed asynchronously (like USB or firewire), and things can
> > only get worse. Thus we need to look for generic solutions, the trick of
> > maintaining probe ordering will work around problems today but we'll
> > still hit the wall in an increasing number of cases in the future.
> 
> That's exactly why udev was created :)
> 
> It can handle bus ordering issues already today just fine, and distros
> use it this way in shipping, "enterprise ready" products.

Only up to a certain point and for certain drivers... but yeah. That's
probably the right direction to take. Now, I'll let you and Alan argue
wether it's sufficient or not to move toward a fully parallel probing :)

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux