Andreas Steinmetz writes:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of
> > 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels,
> > people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since
> > they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway)
>
> Currently I'm working with ARM based embedded systems. I prefer 2.4
> kernels to 2.6 as they are smaller thus leaving more flash for jffs2.
> Not speaking of the kernel a gcc 4.1.1 compile of code for a LPC2103
> resulted in a clearly smaller binary as the same compile with gcc 3.4.
> Thus I really would like to be able to use gcc 4.x with 2.4 kernels.
> There are even kernel miscompiles with gcc 3.4 that might be fixed with
> gcc 4 (one has to try).
I've done a fair amount of ARM user-space hacking recently, and the
number of bug fixes one has to apply to gcc-3.3 or gcc-3.4 to make it
even semi-correct on ARM is scary. Since these versions aren't supported
any more, being able to use newer, hopefully less buggy, and _supported_
gcc versions is clearly beneficial.
Of course, this is not an issue for x86 users.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
