Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:45:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra ([email protected]) wrote:Just pure openssh for control connection (admin should be able to login).These periods of degenerated functionality should be short and infrequent albeit critical for machine recovery. Would you rather have a slower ssh login (the machine will recover) or drive/fly to Zanzibar to physically reboot the machine?It will not work, since you can not mark openssh sockets as those which are able to get memory from reserved pool. So admin unable to check the system status and make anything to turn system's life on.
This is incorrect, please see my previous email. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- Next by Date: Re: Removing of UTS_RELEASE in include/linux/version.h
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
- Index(es):