Ar Mer, 2006-08-16 am 18:54 -0400, ysgrifennodd Mark Lord: > Roger Heflin wrote: > > > > It looks like the older DMA recovery code never works on this chipset, > > once it goes into DMA recovery it never comes out of it. DMA recovery is fairly broken in drivers/ide especially if it tries to change mode. libata does not have this problem and I have no plans to even try and fix the drivers/ide code for this issue as its a major piece of work. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Roger Heflin <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- References:
- What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Roger Heflin <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Roger Heflin <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Roger Heflin <[email protected]>
- Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] NFS: possible NULL pointer deref in nfs_sillyrename()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
- Previous by thread: Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- Next by thread: Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux?
- Index(es):
 |