Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)

[Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>]

On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 19:39 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Add the following system calls for UB management:
>   1. sys_getluid    - get current UB id
>   2. sys_setluid    - changes exec_ and fork_ UBs on current
>   3. sys_setublimit - set limits for resources consumtions
> 

Why not have another system call for getting the current limits?

But as I said in previous mail, configfs seems like a better choice for
user interface.  That way user has to go to one place to read/write
limits, see the current usage and other stats.

> Signed-Off-By: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
> Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>

	...<snip>...
> +
> +/*
> + *	The setbeanlimit syscall
> + */
> +asmlinkage long sys_setublimit(uid_t uid, unsigned long resource,
> +		unsigned long *limits)
> +{

> +	ub = beancounter_findcreate(uid, NULL, 0);
> +	if (ub == NULL)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ub->ub_lock, flags);
> +	ub->ub_parms[resource].barrier = new_limits[0];
> +	ub->ub_parms[resource].limit = new_limits[1];
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub->ub_lock, flags);
> +

I think there should be a check here for seeing if the new limits are
lower than the current usage of a resource.  If so then take appropriate
action.

-rohit


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/