Re: [PATCH] IB/uverbs: Fix lockdep warning when QP is created with 2 CQs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 09:43 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Arjan, here's a case that disproves your rule of thumb that rwsems
> are equivalent to mutexes as far as correctness goes: you can't have
> an AB-BA deadlock with nested rwsems when using down_read().  In other
> words, the following:
> 
> 	down_read(&lock_1);
> 					down_read(&lock_2);
> 	down_read(&lock_2);
> 					down_read(&lock_1);
> 
> is perfectly safe

it's safe as long as you never ever do a down_write nested inside or
outside a down_read of any of these locks....

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux