On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:33:00PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > > This is absolutely not correct. Routers forward packets. They do not mangle
> > > the data in them.
> >
> > Believe it or not, there are a lot of routers nowadays that can do NAT.
> > And even for very basic NAT, you have to recompute the TCP checksum, which
> > means that you mangle data within the packet. Even worse, some of them are
> > able to NAT complex protocols such as FTP and for this, they need to mangle
> > the application payload. OK, this should not be the router's job, but it's
> > often the best placed to do the job, and there is customer demand for this.
>
> Just because you are using a Linksys/Netgear or god else knows what to
> mangle your packets and call that device a router
That's not what I call a router !
> does not mean that normal service providers have NAT enabled on
> their GSRs and Junipers.
not on the PE, but offen on the CE.
> The issue is not in a router running IOS somewhere. The issue is in the
> broken code/broken driver/broken something on the end-point.
He may very well have an IOS based 1600 or equivalent doing a very dirty NAT.
> Alex
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
