On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:23 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> +static inline struct pid *task_pid(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return task->pids[PIDTYPE_PID].pid;
> +}
Does this mean we can start to deprecate the use of tsk->pid?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Containers] [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [Containers] [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- References:
- Start using struct pid.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
- Start using struct pid.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] pid: Implement pid_nr
- Next by Date: Re: Strange write starvation on 2.6.17 (and other) kernels
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] pid: Implement access helpers for a tacks various process groups.
- Index(es):
 |