Re: The rest of my proc cleanup.

These patches seem ok to me:
 1) in their trivial impact on cpusets, and
 2) as a good cleanup.

Perhaps others wiser (more seniority in the school of
hard knocks) will see problems with them.  I don't.

Thanks.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • The rest of my proc cleanup.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vt: Update spawnpid to be a struct pid_t
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/7] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers.
• Next by thread: lockdep: adding bonding device triggers warning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]