Re: [PATCH for review] [140/145] i386: mark cpu_dev structures as __cpuinitdata

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:43:23AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 02:46 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
 > > In-Reply-To: <1155518783.5764.10.camel@localhost>
 > > 
 > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:26:23 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
 > > 
 > > > > > The different cpu_dev structures are all used from __cpuinit callers what
 > > > > > I can tell. So mark them as __cpuinitdata instead of __initdata. I am a
 > > > > > little bit unsure about arch/i386/common.c:default_cpu, especially when it
 > > > > > comes to the purpose of this_cpu.
 > > > > 
 > > > > But none of these CPUs supports hotplug and only one (AMD) does SMP.
 > > > > So this is just wasting space in the kernel at runtime.
 > > > 
 > > > How could this be wasting space? If you compile with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 > > > disabled then __cpuinitdata will become __initdata - ie the same as
 > > > before. Not a single byte wasted what I can tell.
 > > 
 > > I was talking about wasted space with HOTPLUG_CPU enabled, of course.
 > > Nobody is ever going to hotplug a VIA, Cyrix, Geode, etc. CPU, yet your
 > > patch makes the kernel carry that code and data anyway.
 > 
 > remember that suspend uses software hot(un)plug as well...

Only for non-boot CPUs. The vendors above (with exception of VIA)
never made SMP systems.

		Dave
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/