On 08/15, Esben Nielsen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> >Sure, this needs a comment.
>
> It is even better if you can read the code without a comment. Good code
> doesn't need comments.
Yes. But from my point of view, the current code needs a comment to explain
why do we take ->pi_lock, this is hard to understand at least to me.
It is even better if we don't take ->pi_lock for ->wait_list manipulation.
Imho.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
