Re: + ext3-and-jbd-cleanup-replace-brelse-to-put_bh.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:46:13PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> Replace all brelse() calls with put_bh().  Because brelse() is
> old-fashioned, has a weird name and neelessly permits a NULL

> --- a/fs/ext3/balloc.c~ext3-and-jbd-cleanup-replace-brelse-to-put_bh
> +++ a/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ do_more:
>  		overflow = bit + count - EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
>  		count -= overflow;
>  	}
> -	brelse(bitmap_bh);
> +	put_bh(bitmap_bh);

Is it safe to always s/brelse/put_bh/ ? Or someone has to audit every
occurence for this "neelessly permits a NULL"?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux