On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:32:10 +0100
David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ian Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'm having trouble duplicating this.
> > Is there any more info. about this I'm missing?
>
> Works fine for me also.
>
> Andrew, can you do the following:
>
> cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/*
sony:/home/akpm> cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/*
NV SERVER PORT USE HOSTNAME
NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID FSC
sony:/home/akpm> ls -l /net/bix
total 1025280
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 boot
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 118784 Jun 26 00:48 dev
drwxr-xr-x 98 root root 8192 Aug 14 04:03 etc
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Apr 1 2004 home
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 2003 initrd
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 lib
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Mar 10 2004 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 8 2003 misc
?--------- ? ? ? ? ? /net/bix/mnt
?--------- ? ? ? ? ? /net/bix/usr
drwxrwxrwx 8 root root 4096 Jul 10 02:50 opt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 proc
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 Aug 7 16:39 root
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 57344 Apr 24 2004 rpms
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8192 Apr 10 03:19 sbin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1048576000 Mar 12 2004 swap
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 12 2004 sys
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 tftpboot
drwxrwxrwt 14 root root 16384 Aug 14 09:57 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 var
sony:/home/akpm> cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/*
NV SERVER PORT USE HOSTNAME
v3 c0a80221 801 1 bix
NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID FSC
v3 c0a80221 801 0:21 802:0 no
> And can you try mounting "bix:/" manually to see if that exhibits the same
> problem?
sony:/home/akpm# mount bix:/ /mnt/bix
sony:/home/akpm# ls -l /mnt/bix
total 1025288
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 boot
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 118784 Jun 26 00:48 dev
drwxr-xr-x 98 root root 8192 Aug 14 04:03 etc
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Apr 1 2004 home
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 2003 initrd
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 lib
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Mar 10 2004 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 8 2003 misc
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Jul 3 15:29 mnt
drwxrwxrwx 8 root root 4096 Jul 10 02:50 opt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 proc
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 Aug 7 16:39 root
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 57344 Apr 24 2004 rpms
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8192 Apr 10 03:19 sbin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1048576000 Mar 12 2004 swap
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 12 2004 sys
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 tftpboot
drwxrwxrwt 14 root root 16384 Aug 14 09:57 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 Mar 22 2005 usr
drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 var
sony:/home/akpm# mount bix:/usr/src /mnt/bix/usr/src
sony:/home/akpm# ls -l /mnt/bix
total 1025288
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 boot
drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 118784 Jun 26 00:48 dev
drwxr-xr-x 98 root root 8192 Aug 14 04:03 etc
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Apr 1 2004 home
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 2003 initrd
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Apr 10 03:19 lib
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Mar 10 2004 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 8 2003 misc
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Jul 3 15:29 mnt
drwxrwxrwx 8 root root 4096 Jul 10 02:50 opt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 proc
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 Aug 7 16:39 root
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 57344 Apr 24 2004 rpms
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8192 Apr 10 03:19 sbin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1048576000 Mar 12 2004 swap
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 12 2004 sys
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 tftpboot
drwxrwxrwt 14 root root 16384 Aug 14 09:57 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 Mar 22 2005 usr
drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 4096 Mar 10 2004 var
sony:/home/akpm# ls -l /mnt/bix/usr/src
total 1049780
drwxr-xr-x 21 akpm akpm 4096 Jun 17 16:02 24
lrwxrwxrwx 1 akpm akpm 5 Jan 23 2006 25 -> devel
drwxr-xr-x 27 akpm akpm 4096 May 20 01:44 25-alpha
...
> It'd be useful to know if autofs is actually having an effect.
Everything seems OK doing it by hand.
> Also, can you do a module list and check that it's autofs4 that's being used,
> and not autofs.
sony:/home/akpm# lsmod|grep auto
autofs4 20228 1
> It would be handy if we could rule out an adverse interaction
> between nfs and autofs4.
I'd say that's exactly what it is.
> > Bisection shows that the bug is introduced by git-nfs.patch.
>
> But what does it actually show? Do you know where the bug is then? (I don't
> know exactly how bisection works).
>
I mean: bisection searching through the rc4-mm1 patch pile indicates that:
everything up to but not including git-nfs.patch: OK
add git-nfs.patch to the above: fails.
The server is running 2.6.17-rc1-mm3, if that matters. (It shouldn't:
git-nfs.patch has changed the client's behaviour).
And, as I said, this machine is running stock mostly-up-to-date FC5.
sony:/home/akpm> rpm -q autofs
autofs-4.1.4-29
sony:/home/akpm> rpm -V autofs
sony:/home/akpm>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
