>> even more, as I'm now looking at it, this code seems
>> outright wrong in using iret since that unmasks NMIs - Stas, is
>> your pending adjustment to the 16-bit stack handling going to
>> overcome this?)
>No, it leaves the NMI path almost untouched.
>But what exactly problem do you see with this iret?
>If it unmasks NMI, then it does so for reason, which
>is a return from an NMI handler. What exactly is wrong
>with it?
Oh, yes, you're right, I didn't pay attention to the second do_nmi
call in that path.
Sorry, Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
