Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 21:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:40:53 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Testcase:
> > 
> > Mount an NBD device as sole swap device and mmap > physical RAM, then
> > loop through touching pages only once.
> 
> Fix: don't try to swap over the network.  Yes, there may be some scenarios
> where people have no local storage, but it's reasonable to expect anyone
> who is using Linux as an "enterprise storage platform" to stick a local
> disk on the thing for swap.

I wish you were right, however there seems to be a large demand to go
diskless and swap over iSCSI because disks seem to be the nr. 1 failing
piece of hardware in systems these days.

> That leaves MAP_SHARED, but mm-tracking-shared-dirty-pages.patch will fix
> that, will it not?

Will makes it less likely. One can still have memory pressure, the
remaining bits of memory can still get stuck in socket queues for
blocked processes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux