On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > I didn't capture all of the xfs_repair output, but I did get this : > ... > Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... > - setting up duplicate extent list... > - clear lost+found (if it exists) ... > - clearing existing "lost+found" inode > - deleting existing "lost+found" entry > - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... > - agno = 0 > - agno = 1 > - agno = 2 > - agno = 3 > - agno = 4 > - agno = 5 > - agno = 6 > LEAFN node level is 1 inode 412035424 bno = 8388608 Ooh. Can you describe this test case you're using? Something with a bunch of renames in it, obviously, but I'd also like to be able to reproduce locally with the exact data set (file names in particular), if at all possible. thanks! -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] XFS: possibly uninitialized variable use in fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c::xfs_da_node_lookup_int()
- Next by Date: Re: What's the NFS OOM problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
- Index(es):
 |