On Wed 2006-08-09 21:52:10, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 21:38, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > Comments welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten half the reason why I didn't want
> > > to make Suspend2 into incremental patches! You're a brave man!
> >
> > Why does this serve as a reminder? No, it is not easy to merge big
> > patches to mainline. But it is actually a feature.
>
> It serves as a reminder because it shows (just the description, I mean), how
> inter-related all the changes that are needed are.
>
> I don't get the "it is actually a feature" bit.
Well, it is good that submitting patches is hard ... because kernel
ends cleaner that way.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]