Re: module compiler version check still needed?

On Sunday 13 August 2006 06:59, Keith Owens wrote:
> Andi Kleen (on Sun, 13 Aug 2006 06:48:36 +0200) wrote:
> >
> >Does anybody know of any reason why we would still need the compiler version
> >check during module loading? AFAIK on i386 it was only needed to handle
> >2.95 (which got dropped) and on x86-64 it was never needed. Is there
> >a need on any other architecture for it?
> 
> IA64 still needs the check.  include/asm-ia64/spinlock.h generates
> different calls to the out of line spinlock handler, depending on the
> version of gcc.

Thanks. But I guess it could be used to MODULE_ARCH_VERMAGIC for ia64 only then.
If nobody else complains I will do that.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: module compiler version check still needed?
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: module compiler version check still needed?
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: module compiler version check still needed?
    • From: Keith Owens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.17.6 Kernel Oops: kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
• Previous by thread: Re: module compiler version check still needed?
• Next by thread: Re: module compiler version check still needed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]