Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9

On 13/08/06, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Michal,

On 13/08/06, Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you look at this?
>
=======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]

Thanks for this. Did you get this with the previous version of
kmemleak (0.8) or you just tried it now.

It's kmemleak 0.9 issue. I have tested kmemleak 0.8 on 2.6.18-rc1and
2.6.18-rc2. I haven't seen this before.

I'll have a look.

--
Catalin

Regards,
Michal

--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
    • From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
    • From: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
    • From: "Michal Piotrowski" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
    • From: "Catalin Marinas" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
• Next by Date: Re: softirq considered harmful
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]