Re: [PATCH for review] [108/145] x86_64: Some preparationary cleanup for stack trace

On Sunday 13 August 2006 08:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:37:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > - Remove unused all_contexts parameter 
> > No caller used it
> 
> s390 does and now it's busted.

I had actually undone this later because all_contexts == 0 fixed
the previously commented out i386-stacktrace-unwinder (= use dwarf2
unwinder for i386 lockdep). So should be ok now on firstfloor.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH for review] [108/145] x86_64: Some preparationary cleanup for stack trace
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH for review] [108/145] x86_64: Some preparationary cleanup for stack trace
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [109/145] x86_64: Convert modlist_lock to be a raw spinlock
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [43/145] i386: Redo semaphore and rwlock assembly helpers
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for review] [108/145] x86_64: Some preparationary cleanup for stack trace
Next by thread: [PATCH for review] [120/145] i386/x86-64: Improve Kconfig description of CRASH_DUMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]