Re: partial reiser4 review comments

[Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>]

Nate Diller wrote:

> On 8/9/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
>
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> > I must admit that standalone code snipplet doesn't really tell me a
>> lot.
>> >
>> >Do you mean the possibility to pass around a filesystem-defined
>> structure
>> >to multiple allocator calls?  I'm pretty sure can add that, I though it
>> >would be useful multiple times in the past but always found ways around
>> >it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Assuming I understand your discussion, I see two ways to go, one is to
>> pass around fs specific state and continue to call into the FS many
>> times, and the other is to instead provide the fs with helper functions
>> that accomplish readahead calculation, page allocation, etc., and let
>> the FS keep its state naturally without having to preserve it in some fs
>> defined structure.  The second approach would be cleaner code design,
>> that would also ease cross-os porting of filesystems, in my view.
>
>
> the second approach is the one i was heading towards with my
> unfinished a_ops patches.  *please* won't someone pay me to do that
> work...
>
> NATE
>
>
You might describe it in a paragraph or so instead of just mentioning
it.....;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/