On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:08 +0900, Tsutomu OWA wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:11:47 +1000
> > Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> said:
>
> > I would be very surprised if this is all that is required for
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME to work correctly on powerpc. Have you verified
> > that the CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME stuff works correctly on powerpc and
> > provides all the features provided by the current implementation?
>
> Well, probably no as you say so.
>
> What I did for CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME is just to fix a compile
> error and to see if the kernel boots or not. As I mentioned,
> it's experimental and is posted to see whether I'm moving in the
> right direction or not.
>
> I'm afraid I have not yet looked into any generic time related
> features/implementations. Looks like generic time related things
> should be on the ToDo list.
You might take a peek at the patch set here:
http://sr71.net/~jstultz/tod/ for a somewhat rough powerpc conversion to
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
