Re: [PATCH for review] [67/145] x86_64: Detect CFI support in the assembler at runtime

> $$$$ becomes $$ when executed.

Ok changed thanks.
 
> I have no better alternatives - except maybe for mktemp.



I personally dislike mktemp btw because it eats up precious
/dev/random entropy for something relatively silly

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH for review] [67/145] x86_64: Detect CFI support in the assembler at runtime
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH for review] [67/145] x86_64: Detect CFI support in the assembler at runtime
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [140/145] i386: mark cpu_dev structures as __cpuinitdata
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix potential deadlock in mthca
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for review] [67/145] x86_64: Detect CFI support in the assembler at runtime
Next by thread: [PATCH for review] [131/145] i386: mark two more functions as __init
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]