On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:46:40AM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote: > Unfortunately, this makes no difference on my setup. Patch applied, > made the obvious little change: > > -#include <linux/dobject.h> > +#include <linux/kobject.h> > > But: [...stack trace deleted...] I'm have a difficult time triggering your bug. Can you post your .config ? bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make all archs use early_param
- Next by Date: [PATCH] make leds.h include relevant headers
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Index(es):