[PATCH for review] [83/145] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



r

From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

When testing for the REX instruction prefix, first check
for 32-bit mode because in compat mode the REX prefix is an
increment instruction.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -141,8 +141,11 @@ static int is_at_popf(struct task_struct
 		case 0xf0: case 0xf2: case 0xf3:
 			continue;
 
-		/* REX prefixes */
 		case 0x40 ... 0x4f:
+			if (regs->cs != __USER_CS)
+				/* 32-bit mode: register increment */
+				return 0;
+			/* 64-bit mode: REX prefix */
 			continue;
 
 			/* CHECKME: f0, f2, f3 */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux