Hi,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Ext4 will support a 48-bit blocknumber format for extents, but I do
> want to make ext4 suitable as a general purpose filesystem, and 32-bit
> systems will be around for I fear far longer than people might wish.
> So while I agree that we shouldn't go _too_ far out of our way to make
> things efficient on 32-bit systems, if it's not that much work to
> support a 32-bit sector_t, we ought to do it.
>
> So how about a compromise? We allow for a 32-bit sector_t in ext4,
> but we drop the SECTOR_FMT, and rely on %llu and typecasts in
> printk's. Then the only other extra hair in the filesystem code will
> be a mount-time check to make sure we don't try to mount a large
> filesystem on system with a 32-bit sector_t.
Thanks, that's what I was hoping for. :)
Disallowing to mount large fs without CONFIG_LBD is not a real problem and
then also truncation is not an issue anymore (except maybe for e2fsck).
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
