On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
> >
> > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
>
> SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying,
> host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.
Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we
ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside
checkstack.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
