Re: [PATCH] memory ordering in __kfifo primitives

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:18:23 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ unsigned int __kfifo_put(struct kfifo *f
>  	/* then put the rest (if any) at the beginning of the buffer */
>  	memcpy(fifo->buffer, buffer + l, len - l);
>  
> +	smp_wmb();
> +
>  	fifo->in += len;
>  
>  	return len;
> @@ -161,6 +163,8 @@ unsigned int __kfifo_get(struct kfifo *f
>  	/* then get the rest (if any) from the beginning of the buffer */
>  	memcpy(buffer + l, fifo->buffer, len - l);
>  
> +	smp_mb();
> +
>  	fifo->out += len;
>  
>  	return len;

When adding barriers, please also add a little comment explaining what the
barrier is protecting us from.

Often it's fairly obvious, but sometimes it is not, and in both cases it is still
useful to communicate the programmer's intent in this way.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/