Re: [PATCH 1/3] Kprobes: Make kprobe modules more portable

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:01:45AM -0500, David Smith wrote:
> > +	if (p->symbol_name) {
> > +		if (p->addr)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		p->addr = kprobe_lookup_name(p->symbol_name) + p->offset;
> > +	}
> 
> What if kprobe_lookup_name() fails

for that case we need the check in your snipplet below.

> or if CONFIG_KALLSYMS isn't set?

I think we should just disallow that case.  having kprobes without kallsyms
is rather pointless.  I'll send a patch to add the dependency to the Kconfig
files.

> Perhaps this needs something like:
> 
> 	if (p->symbol_name) {
> 		if (p->addr)
> 			return -EINVAL;
> 		p->addr = kprobe_lookup_name(p->symbol_name) + p->offset;
> 		if (p->addr == p->offset)
> 			return -EINVAL;
> 	}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/