On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2006-08-09 13:36:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:27, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > Introduce the memory bitmap data structure and make swsusp use in the suspend
> > > > > > phase.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The current swsusp's internal data structure is not very efficient from the
> > > > > > memory usage point of view, so it seems reasonable to replace it with a data
> > > > > > structure that will require less memory, such as a pair of bitmaps.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, 500 lines of code for what... 0.25% bigger image?
> >
> > BTW, that depends on the total size of RAM. On a 1.5 GB i386 box that would
> > be something like 100%.
>
> Well, well, but 99.75% of that is from 3/5 patch, and we could still
> get those 99.75% without bitmaps, right?
Yes. I meant the total gain from all of the changes. [The highmem one would
be quite difficult without bitmaps, I think, because the bitmaps give us the
right ordering of pages automatically.]
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]