Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD

From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:52:34 -0700

> Agreed.  But probably more intrusive than davem would be happy with
> at this point.

I'm much more happy with Evgeniy's network tree allocator, which has a
real design and well thought our long term consequences, than your
work.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
  - From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
  - From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
Next by Date: Re: memory resource accounting (was Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]