On 8/8/06, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
How far back do you get this bug? I mean if you go back and test the previous kernels, where did you start seeing this?
I have so far been unable to provoke the problem under 2.6.16-rt29. I was able to provoke things once easily under 17-rt1, but subsequent attempts to trigger the bug have so far yielded no results. I'm back to poking at 16-rt29 to see if the problem is simply somewhat less likely. -- Robert Crocombe [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Chardev checking of overlapping ranges is incorrect.
- Next by Date: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Index(es):
 |